Sigh. More evidence of fraud on Obama's birth certificate

I've encountered some pretty adamant opinion that the newly offered long firm birth certificate really is authentic, that "Kenya, East Africa" WAS used back in 1961, that others with birth certificates from the same year ALSO have that hospital name on theirs, that "African" was the way they designated race in Hawaii even if it isn't correct. Well, if all that is true, fine, I'd be glad to have all this put to rest finally.

But it doesn't seem to be going away. There are still those who say it's a fake, and even an obvious fake, that anyone who really knows Photoshop KNOWS it's a fake. And some of the things said got me to look more closely at the document myself. One thing was that the letters and numbers don't even all match, though they would have if the document had all been typed on the same typewriter, as would of course normally have been the case in 1961.

So I took a little more careful look and it does seem that there are odd mismatches. Click on the image I've reproduced below to check it out for yourself. (By the way, I only recently discovered that it's possible to zoom in on a screen image -- the option is on the tool bar at the lower right hand corner of my screen. Of course I'm very low tech and everybody else may know this already, but if not, you should know that you can use that feature to look VERY closely at this document).

For instance, compare the capital "A" in "African" with the one in "Africa" on the next line. In "African" the A is flush with the f next to it; in "Africa" it's higher than the f. Typewriter letters always hit the page at the same level. If one key was bent it was always bent, it didn't sometimes hit level and sometimes not.

Same thing with the capital "K." In "Kenya" and "Kalanianaole" it's on the same level as the letter to its right. In "Kapiolani" it's a tad higher and a bit further left from the "a." In "Kansas" it is MUCH higher than the "a" and fainter too, as if the letter hadn't struck the page evenly. That happened with old typewriters but if it happened once it happened every time the letter was struck and that's not the case in this document. Typewriters don't behave that way and they didn't have word processing in 1961.

Also check out the "R" in "BARACK," both the father Barack and the son Barack. No match. Also compare the "O" in "Oahu" with the "O" in "Obama." No match.

From what I've heard the signs of fraud in this document go much beyond these few observations, and I'm not going to take any more time right now ferreting it out myself. In fact the fraud is so obvious it appears to be intentional. No respect for the American citizen, no respect for the office of President, no respect for the Constitution, let's just lead them all around the mulberry bush. We still don't know where Obama was born but by now we ought to know that the man is playing a game of evasion and deceit which makes it very probable that he was not born in this country.

THE LYING LEFTIST MEDIA (Obama Birth Certificate) and the accusation of racism

Aren't there some decent leftists who can't tolerate this stuff either? There must be some out there.

Just the usual. An Associated Press write-up on the political impact of the issue of where Obama was born, that hasn't the decency or honesty to explain why there is a question, just spins out the leftist view of it. Read this piece of bald-faced biased "reporting:"

In recent days several prominent Republicans have distanced themselves, with varying degrees of emphasis, from the false claim that Obama was born in a foreign country.

Right, JUST FLATLY CALL IT a "false claim" which is the leftist view so all who suspect it may be true that he was born in a foreign country are guilty of supporting a claim that is KNOWN to be false.

I'm so glad there is going to be a Judgment Day where liars get their comeuppance. These reporters don't even make a pretense any more of neutrality and objectivity. The American left both in government and in the media is now just a bunch of Chicago thug politicos who don't care how they win.

Obama's birth certificate indicates he was born in Hawaii in 1961.

If that were really an indisputably authentic birth certificate there wouldn't be these questions, but these liars don't care why there are questions, they just want to make it look like there is no such thing as a legitimate question.

IF THAT IS HIS "BIRTH CERTIFICATE" SO IS THE ONE FROM KENYA, AND THE ONE FROM KENYA LOOKS WAY MORE AUTHENTIC.

I cover all this in the blog post down the page.

Right, there is no more America, we're just another banana republic ruled by thugs so why am I going on about this anyway?

======================

Wed. April 27.

Sigh. So today he supposedly produces the long form birth certificate -- while smearing people who raised legitimate questions about why he didn't produce it long ago, what was he spending all that money on and so on.

Nevertheless, at first I was relieved: Finally, it's over.

Then legitimate questions came up about that document too. How come the hospital is given a name that it didn't have until 1978 if this certificate is really from 1961? The hospital had existed since the 1890s but it was called something else before 1978. I googled the name on the certificate and that information is given at Wikipedia.

And how come Obama's father's race is put down as "African" when that is not a race and it was standard in 1961 to put "Negro" for a black father?

There's no end to the fishiness. We ARE a banana republic run by thugs.

===================

Another piece of slimy propaganda being put out by the Left is that the only reason anyone is suspicious of Obama's birthplace is that they are racist. Doesn't matter how obvious the problems are with the evidence supplied, they are going to call it racism. The evil just doesn't stop these days.

Just for the record I'd take Alan Keyes as President any day, and Allen West is looking awfully good too. So much for racism in my questioning Obama's credentials.

Evidence that the American Founding was NOT Christian

Received this link in my email today from a Christian ministry, for The Hidden Faith of the Founding Fathers, a three-hour movie showing that the American founding was pretty much exclusively the product of the Enlightenment, through Freemasonry and the Illuminati, not the product of Biblical thinking as some Christian ministries have claimed.

THIS IS VERY WELL DONE, ALL CHRISTIANS SHOULD SEE THIS.

I've heard some of this before but never so convincingly presented. I DID already know that Jefferson, Paine and Franklin were not Christians, nor Adams, because he was a Unitarian, and I don't know how anyone ever said otherwise, but even the idea that some of the PRINCIPLES of the founding were Christian despite the beliefs of the founders takes a hit in this presentation. For me, the greatest revelation is about George Washington's beliefs.

But I have to admit that overall ANY claim for Christian inspiration of the United States government has been soundly debunked in this presentation. Perhaps the hardest part to digest is that the champion of the Christian argument, David Barton, is shown to have quoted out of context in such a way as to bring his motives into question.

I still need to hear answering arguments from the other side but at the very least I'm now convinced that whatever Christian thinking did influence the American founding is highly compromised by the evident anti-Christian influences.

Birth Pangs of the Lord's Day, from a Biblical point of view

Just happened to see this video, No. 9 in a series of 14, called Megiddo I, the March to Armageddon. This could just as well be in my End Times blog but the emphasis is so political I decided to put it here. This particular segment covers some of the history of the push for a New World Order in speeches by various world leaders over the last century.

I haven't yet seen the whole series. Here is Part 1 and I'll probably be back later to add more to this post.

The Birth Certificate Flap again

Yeah, I know, this has supposedly been put to rest many times over by now, with supposed evidence that Obama was born in the U.S., in Hawaii. Yes, I know there are even Conservatives who believe he was born in the U.S. And yes, there is SOME kind of evidence to that effect, a "Certification of Live Birth" (that doesn't look like any birth certificate I've ever seen -- doesn't look like mine, that's for sure), and a couple of birth announcements in Hawaiian newspapers. Yes, it sort of almost looks like solid enough evidence. But is it really?

We've heard he paid a couple million dollars or so dealing with this question. Did he? If he did, we're just supposed to pretend that means nothing and not let it make us even more suspicious than we already are?

I've also heard it said that he's just playing us, that he really was born in the U.S. and could prove it in a moment but he wants to play the Right for all it's worth and spring it on us when it will do the most damage to his political opponents.

And we're supposed to accept that a President can just withhold evidence required by the Constitution in order to benefit himself politically? I guess in this benighted age fraud is the new righteous, huh?

Yes, there's lots of supposed evidence out there that he was "really" born in Hawaii. Here's a link to MSNBC on the subject from a poster at EvC:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/...519951/ns/politics-more_politics

To sum up the above article:
- The long form birth certificate exists
- The long form birth certificate is state property and by law cannot be released to the public
- The shorter "certification of live birth" is what anybody would get from the state when they requested a copy of their birth certiificate

"What he got, everybody got," said Fukino. "He put out exactly what everybody gets when they ask for a birth certificate."

- Along with the birth certificate, Obama's birth is registered in a public index of vital records

Excuse me, but this doesn't do it for me. When I applied for my birth certificate some twenty or so years ago I got a photocopy of the complete "long form" birth certificate, not something that looked like this document that we are supposed to accept for Obama.

This is so lame: Sure, the original is state property and can't be released to THE PUBLIC, but it CAN be released to Obama himself and HE HAS AN OBLIGATION TO GET IT AND SHOW IT TO US. The certificate he did manage to get supposedly verifies that "the long form birth certificate exists" -- yeah, but since he COULD get the long form for us and doesn't do that, what's to prove the short form is not a fake -- a fake he paid for?

Also, my brother tells me he was also sent something like that short form certificate when he applied about fifteen years ago for his -- he thinks for a passport -- but that when he submitted it for whatever the purpose was he'd requested it they rejected it, and he had to go back to the records office and get them to provide him with the original (long form) certificate.

This raises questions in MY mind, don't know about yours.

If Obama did spend a lot of money on this, exactly what did he pay for anyway? Possibly a fake Certification of Live Birth? Even possibly the entry of his name in the Index of Vital Records? Or perhaps he did get listed there when he was born in Kenya because somebody notified them at the time? That's how it could have happened with the announcements in the newspapers too. I don't know, of course, but this whole thing is so fishy it just has to raise such questions for anyone who really does care about the truth.

Sorry, but that "Certification of Live Birth" is NOT the kind of certificate that "anybody would get" and even if it is for some reason what is given out more recently than when I applied, if my brother is right it isn't regarded as a legal document anyway for some purposes. My brother got HIS long form when he went back and requested it, why can't Obama? That would put all the doubts to rest and surely his is just as available to him as anyone's is. I have mine, it's what they USED to send you automatically. Why they stopped I have no idea but it makes no sense that they stopped. We usually need our birth certificates for a variety of legal purposes including passports -- we need the LEGAL long form version, not this substitute. What good is this substitute anyway? Sure makes ME wonder if the one he produced -- after paying for it? -- isn't a fake anyway.

Then there's that birth certificate from KENYA that's been floating around the internet for some time now. That looks authentic in a way this "short form" from Hawaii doesn't. Sure, they say it's a forgery, but the same is suspected of the Hawaiian certificate and anyone can say anything, where's the ironclad PROOF? AND there's the report that his Kenyan grandmother said she was there when he was born, AND there's the claim that other Kenyans think of him as a Kenyan and there are even some sort of monuments to his citizenship there.

Sorry, if he was born in this country,

1) He has an OBLIGATION to produce IRREFUTABLE EVIDENCE, not something open to question as this document is. If only to quell all the suspiciousness. If he CAN quell it he SHOULD quell it.

2) It should not be hard to produce it. I have irrefutable evidence of MY birth in this country, my brother has his. Why is it so hard for Obama?

Donald Trump is asking these questions these days too and he's got the money to do the research. Good for him I say.

The Left wants us to stuff it. Sorry, the truth in this case requires more than we've been shown.